Rotten Little Girls

Tag: Religion

What is Patriotism?

by Kelly

Bald-Eagle-and-American-Flag

As an American citizen, I have decided to compile a brief list of what I think the major misconceptions of patriotism are:

According to many, you are only a TRUE patriot if…

1. you think our government can do no wrong (at least in terms of foreign policy)
2. you’re religious and/or Christian
3. you speak English as your primary language
4. you wear a flag pin to political rallies
5. your favorite right is the right to bear arms
6. you are pro-death penalty
7. you believe that the Pledge of Allegiance is something our FOUNDING FATHERS wrote, so anyone who refuses to say it or has a problem with the mention of God must not be a patriot
8. you refer to what the FOUNDING FATHERS would have wanted as if it is gospel

Now, here is the reality, folks:

1. the government can and does fuck up (cough, Iraq, cough)

2. there is no official American religion

3. there is also no official American language

4. freedom of expression ring a bell?

5. the right to bear arms is important because it allows citizens to defend themselves against their own government (I doubt the FOUNDING FATHERS were thinking we would end up terrorizing each other)

6. as the “most progressive country” in the world, don’t you think it’s barbaric that we still have the death penalty?

7. The Pledge of Allegiance was written in the 19th century. The words “one nation under God” were added in the 1950′s to weed out potential communists. The FOUNDING FATHERS had jack shit to do with it. Furthermore, they were fans of the separation of church and state. Hmmm…

8. Guess what? The FOUNDING FATHERS created the Constitution so that it could be amended in the future. Times change, values change, and it’s important to re-evaluate our social contract at least ONCE a century! Change is good. You like progress don’t you? You don’t like progress!? You are anti-American!!

Any other misconceptions you can think of? Please share in the comment section.

- Dollface

American Perceptions of Female Suicide Bombers

by Kelly

The following is an extremely abridged version of my final essay for one of my classes last semester. Hope you all find it interesting!

statue-of-libertyIn a post-9/11 world, the term “suicide bomber” has a visceral effect on Americans. Immediately, images of Middle Eastern men in market places, bombs strapped to their chests, come to mind. Suicide bombing is a particular frightening and effective form of terrorism – it is hard to combat, hard to predict, and involves intense levels of courage and devotion to a cause bent on destruction. Though the first female suicide bomber was a 16 year old girl who blew herself up in 1988 (Zedalis, 2004: 8), in the post-9/11 years the American media has increasingly paid unique attention to female “martyrs.” The constant articles detailing the violence wreaked by male suicide bombers has caused the American public to become almost de-sensitized to Middle Eastern terrorism (provided it’s on foreign soil). However, female suicide bombers, though more and more common, are still considered a “hot topic.” Due to their gender, the media sensationalizes their stories to a problematic degree. I believe that most Americans’ first instinct is to assume suicide bombers are male, due to the fact that the media has inundated us with story after story about male suicide bombers in the Middle East. However, I believe that articles about female suicide bombers discuss their motives more deeply and arouse greater sympathy from readers.

While suicide terrorism can be traced back to the 11th century, the use of female suicide terrorists (in this case, suicide bombers) is relatively recent (Zedalis, 2004: 7). However, in the recent decades there has been a significant increase in the number of women in terrorist organizations and the number of successful and attempted suicide bombings committed by women. There are several advantages to using a female suicide bomber. On the one hand, she is unlikely to be searched and can smuggle bombs more easily under her robes. On the other hand, there is the stereotype that women are nonviolent and therefore they typically garner less suspicion than their male counterparts while carrying out their mission, (Shedd, 2006: 7). Finally, female suicide bombers generally get more publicity, the resulting psychological effects of which can be particularly useful to terrorist organizations – women terrorists tend to receive more public sympathy than men, which can lead to an increase in the recruitment rate of new members to terrorist organizations. Indeed, “in these contexts, differences in coverage [between genders] may encourage terrorists to use women as operatives to secure frequent and more sympathetic coverage,” (Shedd, 2006: 2). While male suicide bombers are more common (at least, presently), female suicide bombers generally receive more written coverage, (Shedd, 2006: 26).

While some terrorist groups historically did not include women in their ranks for religious reasons and to preserve the fraternal bond that strengthened the loyalty of their members, in the last decade many religious leaders have declared “fatwa’s” (religious rulings) allowing women to become terrorists out of necessity. They claim that these are temporary measures for desperate times, (Shedd, 2006: 17). Women are becoming very advantageous to terrorist organizations – especially considering they have a higher rate of success due to their gender and the fact that their successful attacks make a greater splash in the media.

Though I did not extensively research how the media depicts these women, there is the usual theme: “poor brainwashed widow exploited by terrorist organizations”. I think that people would do well to remember that women are just as capable of being motivated by political aims and a sense of religious imperative as men. While I do not condone the actions of female suicide bombers, I do not think they are all merely pawns in the hands of their male comrades.

I would advise the American media to avoid giving female suicide bombers any more attention than male bombers, because the amount of media coverage a female terrorist receives is causing more terrorist groups to see the usefulness of women in their organizations. Unfortunately, by indulging our curiosity about female suicide bombers we are merely furthering the aims of terrorist organizations.

Works Cited

Shedd, J. R., (2006). Understanding Female Terrorists: An Analysis of Motivation and Media Representation. American Political Science Association. Retrieved May 5, 2009, from http://www.allacademic.com/meta/p153284_index.html

Zedalis, Deborah D. (2004). Female Suicide Bombers. Strategic Studies Institute, Retrieved May 5, 2009, from http://www.strategicstudiesinstitute.army.mil/pdffiles/PUB408.pdf

- Dollface

For those curious, the bulk of my essay was devoted to a pilot study I conducted in which I interviewed college students about their perceptions of suicide bombers. If you want to know about my results, feel free to email me!

What are your thoughts & opinions on American media coverage of female suicide bombers? Let me know in the comment sections.

Also, here is a great post about female suicide bombers that I found while looking for a picture for this post. I’m definitely going to add this blog to my RSS feed.

The Abortion Post

by Kelly

I am pro-choice. If that mere fact offends you, I suggest finding alternative reading material.

Abortion+Activists

So for those of you still reading, I like to have a discussion about abortion. Specifically, the future of the right to choose in America and the current threats to Roe v. Wade. Oh, and the fact that our President is hailed for pussy-footing around the whole issue. (I love you B, but come on!)

If you didn’t hear, President Obama gave a cute little speech at Notre Dame the other day. Notre Dame, home of the Fighting Irish, is quite possibly the best Catholic university in our country. (At least, that’s what my Irish Catholic uncle tells me, but I digress). So, in his speech President Obama said the following on the subject of abortion:

“I do not suggest that the debate surrounding abortion can or should go away…Because no matter how much we may want to fudge it — indeed, while we know that the views of most Americans on the subject are complex and even contradictory — the fact is that at some level, the views of the two camps are irreconcilable…Each side will continue to make its case to the public with passion and conviction. But surely we can do so without reducing those with differing views to caricature…”

Also, this little nugget of goodness:

“…That’s when we begin to say, ‘Maybe we won’t agree on abortion, but we can still agree that this is a heart-wrenching decision for any woman. So let us work together to reduce the number of women seeking abortions by reducing unintended pregnancies. Let’s make adoption more available. Let’s provide care and support for women who do carry their children to term.”

Okay. Obama, I agree with you – mostly. I agree that we should toss out abstinence-only sex education and increase the availability of affordable birth control. I also agree that we should provide care for women who do carry their “precious” children to term (funny that the pro-lifers love fetuses but don’t give a fuck what happens to them after they are actually born). However…

What is this nonsense about abortion being a heart-wrenching decision for any woman? Let’s stop sugar-coating this shit, people. I’m willing to say this straight up: If I got pregnant today I would abort it ASAP, no qualms, no hesitation. Give me that RU-486 pill, ma’am, thank you very much. I’m too young and I have no desire what-so-ever to bring a child into this world for at least 10 years (if ever).

If men were the ones who gave birth, do you think abortions would be “heart-wrenching” for all of them? Hell, abortion would be as common and accessible as breast augmentation.

ProChoice

Obviously, to have an abortion is a difficult choice for some women to make. By no means do I want to belittle their emotions and experiences regarding their abortions. However, I’m tired of the shame and disgust associated with abortion. For those of us who don’t think life starts at conception, the right to an abortion is a no-brainer. For those who do think abortion=baby-killing…why don’t you worry about saving your own soul, alright? You’re perfectly willing to support a war in Iraq, which has killed thousands of people ALREADY BORN and you sleep at night just fine, so I think you can get over a few women “killing” their unborn fetus. (EDIT: I’m aware this does not extend to ALL pro-lifers…)

I’d like to say this post is open for ANY and ALL commentary/debate/what-have-you. I would love to hear from pro-lifers, pro-choicers, pro-baby killers, whatever the hell you identify as. Just remember:

1) Keep it civil. No personal attacks will pass through comment moderation.
2) If you just want to preach your religious doctrine, go somewhere else. I’m a heathen and proud of it.
3) If your post contains the words “baby murderer,” “devil worshipper,” or “evil slutty bitch” (and you’re not being sarcastic), your comment will not pass through moderation.

I obviously have much more to say on the topic, but I thought I would respond in the comments section rather than standing up on my rotten little soapbox and boring you all to tears. :-) Hope to hear from you.

Yours Truly,
Dollface

EDIT: To the guy who commented telling me to “shut up”… I’d like to direct you to my “About Us” page in which I politely but firmly state that I will not shut up, for anyone. For more information on this subject, click here.

newscom-DW-052500-pro-life-

P.S. Free “President Bush Sucks” condoms for the 25th comment! (Shameless attempt to get you all debating, I know)

Coming Out of the (Religious) Closet

by Kelly

atheist-ghost-buster_thumbnailI’m an atheist. For those who have read my blog extensively, this probably isn’t news to you. However, I’ve decided I need to have a “coming out” post, if you will. I just don’t think we (atheists, and our close pals, the agnostics) spend enough time discussing our beliefs. Yes, we have beliefs. No, I don’t have to go to church and worship a god to think about the universe, death, and other important topics.

While nonbelievers apparently make up 16% of the American population (according to Bill Maher’s Religulous, anyway), it can feel pretty lonely sometimes when most, if not all of your friends, colleagues, and family members are religious. Since we are a minority, there is always this push to conform to society’s expectations, to assimilate. I have been counseled by one of my parents to pretend to be “agnostic” because it makes people more comfortable knowing that there’s at least the possibility of my salvation. Another relative has told me that it is important, above all else, to be spiritual, even if I can’t bring myself to attend Sunday mass.

It is kind of amusing the lengths people will go to fit you into a box you’re just not meant for. For example, my grandmother was terrified that I would go to hell if I wasn’t baptized. My parents, one a former Lutheran, the other a former Catholic, thought baptism was for the birds. So, my saintly grandmother took it upon herself to get some holy water and baptized me in her living room. I was saved. At least, until the local priest informed my grandmother that only priests can baptize and that indeed, her granddaughter was going to rot in hell.

Can I just say, this is what I find to be so fucked up about religion. Couldn’t the priest just let my sweet old grandmother have some peace of mind? Did he have to tell her that I’m doomed for eternal suffering? It seems a little ridiculous that he felt compelled to ruin her day just because of these “rules” written in some ancient book – I mean, the Bible.

Another interesting tale centering my grandmother (who, I might add, is the only Christian I’ve ever met that perfectly represented what virtue means) is that she was a Methodist before marrying my Irish Catholic grandfather. Grandpa forced her to convert to Catholicism before they wed, and for the rest of her days, my grandmother was devout and diligent in her beliefs. My grandfather rarely went to church. The moral of this story? Don’t make your wife convert because you are deeply religious, do it because your religion is “better” than hers. Force her to give up her childhood beliefs so that you can claim your children are being raised right – according to other Catholics, anyway.

Beyond the fact that I find religion to be the “opiate of the masses” (to quote my pal Karl), I must admit it was pretty nice not being forced to go to Sunday school or church. My Sundays were spent with my family, playing games and going to art and science museums while other children were on their knees, hands clasped together in prayer. The few times I did attend church on Easter Sunday, I was allowed to bring a sketchbook and my cousins and I would have contests to see who could eat the most mini Milky Ways without our parents noticing.

atheist-cartoonAll of that aside, what I’d like is to be allowed to believe (or disbelieve) whatever I want. We’re supposed to be respectful of religion; in fact most atheists tip-toe around religious people’s beliefs because their faith is sacred, meaningful, and holy. Yet, our beliefs are persecuted, mocked, and questioned the second we admit to being atheist. When someone talks about their faith, they command respect and awe from their peers. When I voice my beliefs, people tell me I’m going to hell, I’m a Satan-worshipper, or that I’m morally bankrupt. I get asked the same question over and over, “So you don’t believe in ANYTHING!?”

Fuck that. I believe in tolerance, I believe in diplomacy rather than waging holy war, and I believe that if I have one more person preach to me about the severity of my sins I’m going to pass out from high blood pressure. So to the people who think it’s “in bad taste” to discuss religion over dinner, I say, bring it on. I’d love to share.

- Dollface, Heathen Extraordinaire

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 140 other followers