Blog Action Day: Poverty and Education in America

15 10 2008

We’ve all seen the statistics: Those with a college degree earn significantly more annually than their counterparts who only graduated from high school (or didn’t graduate at all). According to a 2007 College Board study, “people with a bachelor’s degree earn over 60 percent more than those with only a high school diploma . . . Over a lifetime, the gap in earning potential between a high school diploma and a B.A. is more than $800,000.”

If you notice, there is even a significant disparity between a bachelor’s degree (4 years of college) and an associate’s degree (2 years of college, usually at a community or junior college). These statistics have an obvious conclusion: it’s good to have a college education because you can make more money (and the chances of enjoying your career are higher). However, with the cost of college sky-rocketing with each passing year and the requirements to get into premier colleges becoming more stringent, there is an obvious inequality between who can go to college and who can’t.

Our country is increasingly divided into the “haves” and the “have nots”. On the one hand you have the upper middle class and upper class and on the other hand you have the lower middle class and lower class. The shrinking middle class, in my mind, can go either way, depending on where they live in America and what opportunities are afforded them. The “haves” are able to send their children to private schools or live in affluent neighborhoods with good school systems. They can pay for SAT prep and after-school tutors. They can bring their children to soccer or violin practice (and afford the uniforms, sports equipments, and musical instruments that come with these activities). The “have nots” have less choices. They live in whichever neighborhood they can afford, where the local public school may not get a lot of funding. They work at least one full-time job (sometimes two) and therefore don’t have the time to pick their kids up from school, take them to extracurricular activities, or even just be at home to help them with their homework.

Just getting through elementary and middle school can be a challenge for children from lower income families. They are faced with obstacles that more-affluent families are not. Since I come from one of those lower income families, I have first hand experience with some of these obstacles: schools running out of paper by November, staying at the free after-school program at the local library until my mother came home at dinner time, apathetic teachers who weren’t motivated to teach a bunch of “unruly” children. Of course, these are merely examples, and they aren’t necessarily the experience everyone has had. However, I know that systematically the quality of education children receive in lower income neighborhoods is severely lacking compared to the wealthy neighborhoods. Where I grew up, we were lucky to have some Apple computers donated to our elementary school by the local bank, yet in a wealthy suburb several miles away, the children had plasma screen TVs in their state of the art gymnasium.

Now, I could go into the excesses of consumerism (what do you really need TVs in a school gym for??), but it’s less about what the wealthy schools have but what the poor schools don’t have. They need basic school supplies (like paper, pens, chalk), they need better, newer textbooks, and they need desks that aren’t falling apart. They need vibrant, engaging teachers and arts and music programs for their students.

In my high school economics class, we discussed some solutions to this problem. It’s been a few years, but I remember discussing a voucher system. This idea basically entailed giving poor families “vouchers” to go to a better school in a different neighborhood (where I grew up, school systems are divided into districts and you don’t get a lot of choice in where you send your children). However, this idea seemed ludicrous to me even in high school. Obviously all parents would want to send their kids to the better-funded schools. However, those schools can’t take more children than their facilities allow. This would just mean that the schools in poorer neighborhoods would be overlooked even more! To me, the obvious solution is to pour more funding into public schools that need it. However, in a city, this is more of a problem than in a wealthy suburb, since there is only so much revenue and lots of issues that need attention. Unfortunately, on both the state and national level, education often takes second fiddle to more “important” issues such as taxes and gas prices.

So what does this have to do with the wage disparity between college graduates and high school graduates? Well, if I have painted a grim picture of elementary and middle schools, the state of many of our public high schools is worse. High school should prepare students for college, yet many students fall through the cracks. Their over-worked and under-paid teachers don’t have the patience or time to single out promising teenagers who probably could use some guidance. Also, students attending under-funded schools are aware that they aren’t getting the same education as others. They see that people are not expecting much from them, so they don’t rise to the challenge. There is, in a sense, a self-fulfilling prophecy in the minds of lower income students – society doesn’t care about their quality of education, so why should they?

A common stereotype of public school students

A common stereotype of public school students

In our society, many students are not prepared for college, nor do they have the tools to even apply. Some of my friends in high school did not have any help from their parents in filling out applications and the guidance counselors were too overwhelmed to be of much help. While my parents had attended college and knew how the system worked, I recall several fellow students’ parents had never attended college and couldn’t even pay for more than 1 or 2 applications (at around $65 a pop, the average lower income family can’t afford for their child to apply to over 2 colleges). Even the process of applying for college is an obstacle for lower income students – let alone the fact that they are competing for limited slots with their wealthy counterparts who have had an above-average education, good SATs scores (thanks to those Kaplan prep courses), play several instruments and have the luxury of volunteering during their summer months rather than working a minimum wage job.

However, even if a student can overcome these obstacles, they still face one more daunting task: paying for college. Many private colleges cost upwards of $30,000-40,000 a year, and state schools are, on average, $6,000-10,000 annually (I got this from College Board and don’t know how scientific these figures are). However, I do know that a ridiculous amount of colleges charge ridiculous fees. I’m fortunate that I got into a respected college that has a large enough endowment to offer me a substantial grant. Even with that financial aid, I’m still taking out thousands of dollars in loans. I, like many other middle class and lower income students, will be paying off debt for many years to come. The only comfort I get is the knowledge that I’ll (hopefully) be making more money in the long run. I’m not gonna lie, when my friend at college mentioned his dad wrote the school a $30,000 dollar check to pay his tuition, I was speechless. That’s a whole way of life I’ve never encountered before, and to be sure, it’s enviable.

I am not, however, advocating keeping up with the Jones’. I think all public schools should be brought up to a higher standard, but I don’t think we should be buying plasma TV’s for our gymnasiums. Rather, we should be focusing on allocating funds in the right ways. Education is important. While it would be nice if my mom could hand me a check for $30,000, I’m not complaining – I’m just grateful I’m in college and able to enjoy my classes without worrying about whether I can pay for my next meal. If we can improve our public schools, we will be giving our country’s children more of an opportunity to attend college and improve their place in society. Isn’t that the American dream, after all?


Photo Credits Here


This post is part of Blog Action Day 08 – Poverty


Actions

Information

9 responses

15 10 2008
mermaid

i never really thought about how intertwined education and poverty are. but this brings me to really think about the public school system (which i totally despise anyway!)

and props for participating in blog action day! i did as well, but focused my post on respect of individuals living in poverty.
your post makes me think about poverty in a question of blame. poverty exists because we are allowing it to. we as a nation, a society, a world, are to blame.

<33 mermaid

16 10 2008
plastic card printing

Hi
I think the America is educated country and less poor,the education rate is high,in public school system someway the poverty is there,there is more on….

16 10 2008
Dollface

@ mermaid — Thanks for reading, and your comment! I’m going to go check out your post now.

17 10 2008
lenorenevermore

Great post & so important to bring all the topics indeed… & you make it so interesting… cartoons r adorable too! Feel free to visit my blog & hope you say hi! I’m doing ‘pink theme at the moment f October cancer awareness… another good thing, yes?! Hope to hear from you….

17 10 2008
dollyann

SO TRUE. And let me just add on that I went to a fairly well-funded high school, and this is what happened. The school spent thousands of dollars on new ASTROTURF for the football field, yet by the end of the fourth term there wasn’t enough money for paper-which then led to the school boo-hooing that the district wasn’t supportive of its students’ education. Drive an hour from my high school into the next community though and you would see kids that didn’t have money for new textbooks let alone fake grass. Yet my school (mostly white, by the way) was set as an example for others because our students’ parents could afford the after school tutoring, etc.

You know, I read a book not too long ago about the disparity between middle/upper class (usually white) students and gifted inner city/impoverished students (of color, usually). It was called “And Still We Rise” by Miles Corwin. It really showed how money gives kids such a leg-up in America, despite efforts to “standardize” and “nationalize” everything. Social location prevents there from ever being a fair, national standard.

Outstanding blog action day post! :D

15 12 2008
Judi

Fantastic blog post on the link between poverty and the lack of education – or rather, the reception of poor education. So very true!

There are so many issues which could be resolved if we could focus on providing proper education: equal and fair distribution for all students. But, there is more to the issue than merely providing good schools, the issue of schooling is not in isolation of the other contributors to lack of education. If I may, I invite you to visit my blog: http://onceuponalemontree.blogspot.com/.

I am focusing solely on this issue, and would love to increase the conversation. I hope that we can start a movement that will begin to solve this problem.

Thank you!
Judi

21 12 2008
honslow2000

Reading this blog was really quite stunning as I had no idea that it cost money in the States to even apply for college. I was lucky enough to feel the benefits of the UCAS system- where you can apply for at least three Universities for free. Worryingl however we are moving more and more towards privitisation of Higher Education. We no longer have our tuition fees paid for and the Government tries to get round this by providing low interest loans. That doesn’t change thousands of pounds worth of debt at the end of your degree though. Reading the above though makes me realise that we have a way to go before things are as bad as that (though maybe not too bad).
We do have exactly the same problems when it comes to high schools though. There was a real hope when Labour came to power ten years ago that more money would be funded into state secondary schools but it just hasn’t really happened…we get smoke and mirrors about more tests, less tests….anything but more money.

7 01 2009
Beritu

Thank you Judi and to all. This separate and unequal education has been going since the beginning. Politicians talk about it all the time specially during election but never! never! try to correct the problem from the roots.

Now that young citizens with energy and good judgment are talking about it I am hopping the public school would be corrected and becomes a real school than a zoo to trapped children.

I am hopping that Americans will spreak in one voice about this unequal educational situation which is leading to unequal economic situation now than ever!

Please do not stop! Bring it in the open not only the internet.

“Quality Edication for all Americans in America or no Education for all”

America has to stop discriminating her children knowingly. It is a curse.

I am with you! God Bless You for your good heart and judgment!

1 03 2009
Juan Wang

Thanks for the posting. I love the insight. :) Very respiring~

Leave a comment